About Me

My photo
London, United Kingdom
A mythical beast - a female wargamer! I got back into wargaming in the summer of 2011 after a very, very long break. My current interests are Ancients, ACW, 30YW and SciFi gaming.

Saturday, 25 June 2016

Black Ops

No, I'm not suggesting that nefarious types are responsible for me not having finished painting the other three superheroes. That is my own doing. Unless the weather this week is really being controlled by the NWO/MIB/(insert your choice of conspiracy organisation here)...

Monday night saw me playing another game in the runup to Sunday's club game of Jutland; this time the stern chase from Dogger Bank. On Tuesday I was at a Safety/Fire/Facilities etc exhibition at the Excel all day and by the time I got home my hip and knee joints were aching like mad so I didn't feel like painting. Wednesday evening was hot and humid which left me too lethargic to do any painting. As for last night...

Well, I was playing Black Ops with Simon at the club, which provided a welcome break from all the stuff on TV and the 'net about the EU referendum. But that's enough about that - let's just say that we are now living in interesting times...

Anyway, back to Black Ops. For those that don't know these are the rules from Osprey, written by Guy Bowers (editor of Wargames, Soldiers & Strategy) for small unit modern special ops type games.

Simon's force was the People's Vegetarian Liberation Army, a bunch of pretty low quality types; I had the Colonel Sanders' Contractors who were (meant to be) a well trained effective paramilitary unit.

We'd agreed to try out the Stealth scenarios, just to see how they worked. After setting out terrain we rolled to determine the mission for the first game - sabotage. My Contractors had to blow up a cache of weapons (Simon decided that these were Tofu Grenades) in a compound; he was defending with half his force on guard patrol and the rest (including his "Ace") asleep in barracks. I split my force and came in from two edges - the plan was for one team to get into the compound and blow up the tofu stockpile while the other team provided cover.

Everything went well at first. My entry team got into positions without being seen and I decided it was time to enter the compound. Which was when things went tits up. There was a sentry right by the entry point who I decided to take out quietly in close quarter combat. My guy rolled a 1, Simon's sentry rolled a 6, my guy died, Simon's was now activated. What the heck, open fire! Unfortunately all my aimed shots missed their targets and I'd made enough nose to arouse Simon's Ace and activate him. And as he had potential line of sight to some of my guys, he was able to raise the alarm straight away (unless he rolled a one on his reaction roll, which he didn't).

Now, I had carefully positioned the support gunner from the entry team on the roof of a building overlooking the compound. Unfortunately, this turned out to be the barracks where the rest of the PVLA were quartered. They activated next, came out of the building and some started shooting while the rest made their way round to the steps up to the roof.

Meanwhile one of my guys had got into the compound and next to the Tofu cache. He just had to stay next to it for 2 activations and the job would be done. He almost made it, but the PVLA ace took him out (having walked straight past him once in the dark) before he could get the second activation. By then I'd lost 5 of my 8 guys and had to take a break test - I failed which meant my guys had to fall back, leaving the Tofu cache intact.

Sadly, my professionals didn't seem able to shoot for toffee. Mind you, his guys with the RPGs weren't much better as all there shots were complete misses (well, we did declare the first one as a hit on a tree which was behind the guy he shot at!). To a large degree I wasn't helped by Simon having a long run of activation cards which meant he was able to take out most of my unit without me being able to do anything about it.








We then took a short break before playing a second game. This time I was defending - the mission rolled was espionage and the site was a village. Simon had to steal a communication device (to stop Colonel Sanders broadcasting adverts extolling the eating of finger lickin' good chicken). Half my troops would be guards on table, the others were off table patrolling and would only come on when the alarm was raised.

Simon managed to get into the village undetected and get to the transmitter without the alarm being raised. Even after lots of gunfire and RPGs being fired (I rolled a few natural ones). Eventually the alarm was raised and my reinforcements came on. the riflemen must have been practicing as they were able to shoot and took out several PVLA guerillas (unlike their support gunner who still couldn't shoot for toffee and got killed almost immediately). However, numbers told and my unit was soon reduced to just two guys, with the transmitter having been stolen and sneaked out of the village almost unmolested (my "Ace" couldn't shoot for toffee either). In hindsight, I should probably have placed the transmitter more centrally as the PVLA got to it far too quickly, which meant there was less opportunity for my guards to spot them and for the alarm to be raised.








So, what do I think of the rules? They're fun and allow for fast, bloody play. They're quick to pick up, but the card activation can be quite brutal if one side gets a long run of activations. Before Black Ops we would have used Force on Force/Tomorrow's War for this sort of game, but it could be tediously slow and the initiative system was a pain. Black Ops allows for fast play, isn't complex but does capture the feel of this type of operation (OK, maybe a bit bloodier than it would be). The stealth rules played well as the guard reactions are dependent on the amount of noise you make getting there (noise markers are added for running, climbing, shooting etc) and guards only roll for reactions if they have potential line of sight to an attacker - otherwise they either stay still or move 3 inches straight ahead. the wording of the Observation rule and how it would work in stealth scenarios did cause some confusion.

17 comments:

  1. Enjoyable reports and pictures. Loved the two protagonists names.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great fun Tamsin and an interesting review as I was aware of the reviews, but had initially dismissed them. Hearing how user friendly they are might make me go back and have another look.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like a fun set of rules - liked your humourous report and pics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I did enjoy the report. This seems like my sort of game BUT I find card activation really does not come out fair for both sides. But that is my Bugbear.

    I suspect I might prefer this to force on force for skirmish games of 5-10 figures a side, But F on F once 2 or more squads a side are present.

    Did you do a rules review that I have missed? I think I would have liked to have read it if you did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I take the last comment back a small review is in there, but only a small review.

      Delete
  5. Sounded good, I have the rules but not played a game yet!

    ReplyDelete
  6. My first thought when I saw the title of the post that this was a review of the book from Brad Thor! So no it isn't! Great report and pictures from the game! Thanks for sharing!

    Greetings
    Peter

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for the write up, been looking at the rules for another possible side project ..

    And as you say... "Interesting times"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great write up and Black Ops looks like being worth on investigating further.

    Cheers, Ross

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great AAR.Looks like all was a lot of fun and all went for you as planned. O.K. maybe the plan was not good.
    But blame it on the dice.
    I always do...
    Cheers Markus

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nice game report- it has proved to be one of my favourite recent rule releases.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great report, I love the protagonists names

    ReplyDelete
  12. Fun sounding game with all the elements that you'd expect from a stealth-type game, but I think I'd get frustrated with the activation system.
    Great looking table too btw

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sounds like you had a good time with it. By the way, did you get my email response the other day? Look forward to meeting you all in a couple of weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I picked up these rules a few months ago and have not tried them yet. After reading your post I feel like I should give them a go.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ David C - cheers! The names did add to the fun :)

    @ Michael A - thanks, m'Lord! They're definitely a good ruleset for a quick, fun game :)

    @ Dannoc - cheers! The rules do play well :)

    @ Clint - thanks! Card activation can be a pain - it may be worth coming up with some other method for future games :)

    @ Gordon - it was a fun game :)

    @ Francis - cheers! Worth giving them a go :)

    @ Peter - thanks! :)

    @ Dave D - cheers! A side project? Sounds intriguing :)

    @ Ross - thanks! Definitely worth looking at if this sort of game is your thing :)

    @ Markus - I blame the results on the dice and the cards! :)

    @ Pete - cheers! :)

    @ John Yuengling - thanks! Simon had already named the rabble as the PVLA; I came up with the other name as a suitable opponent for them :)

    @ Zabadak - cheers! The card activation is something that I think we'll need to look at :)

    @ J Womack - we did have fun! Look forward to meeting you too :)

    @ Curt - you should, you should :)

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...